Here is an excerpt from the
VSA brief:
VSA urges the Court to order
the city and county of Los Angeles to focus all temporary housing for the
homeless on structures, buildings and tents that allow for ample and
enforceable self-quarantine.
As the president of the
non-profit VSA for the last ten years I have been deeply involved in addressing
the exponential increase in the homeless population in my community. At one point I was the co-chair of the Venice
Neighborhood Council’s Homelessness Committee and currently serve as a
Community Officer on the Venice Neighborhood Council. I hold a BA in psychology
from UCLA and an MA in Urban Studies from the CORO Foundation/Occidental
College. On a personal note, for many years I watched as my parents dealt with
my drug- and alcohol-addicted younger brother, who would have been homeless had
they not converted their garage for him to live in for most of his life.
As you know, the City of Los
Angeles is currently re-purposing city recreation centers for use as temporary
shelters for the homeless. While the concept of converting recreation centers
to shelters appears appropriate in this crisis, it is contraindicated by the
nature of the population itself.
At least 50%, and possibly a
higher percentage, of the homeless population simply lacks the required
self-discipline to abide by any social distancing protocols. Over 50% are
either mentally ill, substance addicted and/or anti-authoritarian, or just too
young to accept the seriousness of the situation (as we saw with partying
students on the beach in Florida recently). One has only to look at the
pandemonium at Third and Rose in Venice on March 24th in the following video to
see that social distancing is not being observed:
https://veniceupdate.com/2020/03/25/25310/
Also, the very nature of
living on the streets for prolonged periods with addiction, poor hygiene and
sanitation, and lack of medical care, have rendered many in this population
immuno-compromised. A larger proportion than the general population have
underlying conditions, which puts them more at risk to COVID-19: heart disease,
hypertension and/or diabetes.
The result is that placing
them in recreation centers on cots on six-foot centers will assure that the
virus will spread quickly among the homeless as well as the caregivers who at
this time are not expected to have the necessary personal protective gear
needed to prevent transmission. It also will put those over 60 and the high
percentage that are immuno-compromised or have underlying conditions at greater
risk than other options. (I would add that this analysis applies equally to
Bridge Housing facilities, which are large communal living facilities, with no
possibility to self-quarantine.)
Apparently, the County
Sheriff understands the need to thin out jail populations to slow the spread of
the virus in jails, but Mayor Garcetti and members of the City Council proceed
in contradiction to the obvious, packing homeless into recreation centers and
Bridge Housing.
All the homeless, but
especially those over 60 and/or those with underlying conditions or
immuno-compromised systems, should be given a priority in rooms in motels,
hotels, student dormitories or military-style tents to self-quarantine.
At UCLA alone, a student
housing blog reports there are beds for over 10,000 students, many of which are
empty due to the university’s closure. There are thousands of beds at other Los
Angeles-area colleges and universities, such USC, Loyola, Pepperdine, etc.
These institutions are likely to be closed through the end of August, possibly
longer. Students remaining in campus housing may be moved all together in one
or two dormitories, freeing up other dormitory rooms for the homeless during
this crisis. Major institutions such as UCLA and USC have student health
centers which are not now seeing students, which could be moved into action to
serve the homeless. Either dormitory kitchens or local, under-utilized
restaurants could deliver daily meals. Campus security along with the LAPD
could help maintain social distancing.
Similarly, military-style
tents set up on 10-foot or even 20-foot centers on the playing fields or
parking lots of stadiums, such as the Rose Bowl and Coliseum, with plenty of
bathrooms and even showers in players dressing rooms, and food concessions,
would be preferable to recreation centers which have little bathroom and shower
capacity.
Of course, the best solution
would be the State’s lease of thousands of now-empty low-priced motel and hotel
rooms to allow for self-quarantine, especially for those with the virus or
those over 60 and/or with underlying conditions.
In light of all the
information coming out of Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong, wide-spread
testing, tracing and self-quarantine for everyone is the only path to slow the
spread and contain the virus. This is not possible on sidewalks, in recreation
centers (or even in Bridge Housing).