https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/los-angeles-is-fighting-its-homeless-problem-one-giant-planter-at-a-time/2019/12/26/660dc73a-22a9-11ea-a153-dce4b94e4249_story.html
Many, many thanks to all those residents and business owners who contributed funds, time, and plants to make the planter box project around the Venice Post Office a reality.
Wishing all our supporters a marvelous New Year with good times, good health, all success and, per chance, a safer community for all to enjoy!
The Venice Stakeholders Association is dedicated to civic improvement. The VSA supports slow growth, protection of the limits of the Venice Local Coastal Specific Plan, neighborhood safety, better traffic circulation, increased parking for residents, neighborhood beautification projects, historic preservation and protection of coastal waters.
Saturday, December 28, 2019
Sunday, December 22, 2019
Brock On Your Block: Mark Ryavec, Community Activist On The Homeless Dilemma
Brock On Your Block: Mark Ryavec, Community Activist On The Homeless Dilemma.
In the latest Brock On Your Block, Phil meets Venice community
activist Mark Ryavec at Venice Beach with hopes of gaining some insight
into strategies for dealing with the runaway growth of the homeless
population in Los Angeles County.
https://smmirror.com/2019/12/brock-on-your-block-mark-ryavec-community-activist-on-the-homeless-dilemma/
https://smmirror.com/2019/12/brock-on-your-block-mark-ryavec-community-activist-on-the-homeless-dilemma/
Thursday, December 19, 2019
Supreme Court Non-Action on Martin Appeal Not a Decision on the Merits
My letter recently sent to the Los Angeles Times:
Editor,
The only certainty that can be taken from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to not hear the appeal in the Boise, ID, Martin case concerning sleeping on sidewalks is the Times' bias and myopia.
While the Martin Decision stands in the nine western states, municipalities in the 41 other states are free to enforce "no sleeping on a sidewalk" ordinances, a fact the Times failed to report. Failure to grant certiorari is not a ruling on the merits of an appeal and, despite your front page headline, the court did not say a word about housing. Actually, the court said nothing and any interpretation amounts to reading tea leaves. The court may simply be waiting for an appeal from another circuit or one with a clearer delineation of the issues. Further, there is nothing in the court's action that precludes cities in the Ninth Circuit from adopting limits on where sleeping on public property is acceptable, such as banning sidewalk encampments within 300 feet of residences.
Mark Ryavec, President, Venice Stakeholders Association
And this is what the Times ran on December 21st:
Editor,
The only certainty that can be taken from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to not hear the appeal in the Boise, ID, Martin case concerning sleeping on sidewalks is the Times' bias and myopia.
While the Martin Decision stands in the nine western states, municipalities in the 41 other states are free to enforce "no sleeping on a sidewalk" ordinances, a fact the Times failed to report. Failure to grant certiorari is not a ruling on the merits of an appeal and, despite your front page headline, the court did not say a word about housing. Actually, the court said nothing and any interpretation amounts to reading tea leaves. The court may simply be waiting for an appeal from another circuit or one with a clearer delineation of the issues. Further, there is nothing in the court's action that precludes cities in the Ninth Circuit from adopting limits on where sleeping on public property is acceptable, such as banning sidewalk encampments within 300 feet of residences.
Mark Ryavec, President, Venice Stakeholders Association
And this is what the Times ran on December 21st:
While
the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Martin vs. City of
Boise stands in the nine western states, municipalities in the 41 other
states are
free to enforce “no sleeping on the sidewalk” ordinances.
Failure
to grant certiorari is not a ruling on the merits of an appeal.
Actually, the court said nothing at all, and any interpretation amounts
to reading of
tea leaves. The court may simply be waiting for an appeal from another
circuit or for one that has a clearer delineation of the issues.
Further,
there is nothing in the court’s action that precludes cities in the 9th
Circuit from adopting limits on where sleeping on public property is
acceptable,
such as banning sidewalk encampments within 300 feet of residences.
Mark Ryavec, Venice. The writer is president of the Venice Stakeholders Assn.
Note that the Times editor felt compelled to remove all of my critiques of the Times' coverage.
Thursday, December 5, 2019
VNC Resident Survey Shows Extreme Dissatisfaction with Mayor Garcetti, Councilman Bonin
VNC Satisfaction
Survey results are in!
The
results of the first Venice Neighborhood Stakeholder Survey are in and they show
residents are extremely dissatisfied with their local elected officials.
The most
notable results:
--Regarding
the performance of their elected officials, both LA Mayor Eric Garcetti and
CD11 Councilman Mike Bonin received 79% dissatisfaction ratings from
respondents.
--90% of
respondents view homelessness as the greatest challenge for Venice.
74% view crime as another major issue, with 74% believing crime has
gotten worse year after year.
--81% of
respondents expressed levels of dissatisfaction with City services in Venice,
and 48% were generally unhappy with the performance of the Venice Neighborhood
Council - the local elected body and advisory board to the Los Angeles City
Council.
--44%
of respondents believed there was a lack of effective [government]
representation, while the proliferation of scooters at 42% was another issue
Venice needs to tackle.
The
several-months long study was approved by the previous Venice Neighborhood Council (VNC) in May of
2019. It was developed and conducted with the assistance of professional survey
research consultants by the VNC Outreach Committee, under the leadership of
former Outreach Chair Hollie Stenson. The purpose was to achieve a
baseline pulse of what Venetians are feeling about their community, and to
provide this information to the newly elected VNC Board, inducted in June of
2019. The goal was also to provide a focus for the new Board and to
improve the Board's service to the Venice community.
Participation in the survey was voluntary. Almost 800
respondents participated in the survey about the issues most important to Venice's
uniquely diverse seaside community.
The full results are available at: https://www.venicenc.org/pdfs/Survey-Results-Final.pdf and
on the Council website at: https://www.venicenc.org.
With 93%
of the respondents living in Venice and 53% residing here for over 20 years,
the Survey reached a core audience of long-time residents who are engaged in
its challenges and issues.
Sixty-eight
percent identified as homeowners and 27% as renters. Forty-one percent were
male, while 54% were female. Thirty-two percent were between the ages of
35-49, 62% were over the age of 50, while only 5% were between the ages of
18-34.
"The
new VNC Board is committed to serving the people we represent during our two-year
term. That's why this survey is important - we have a direction as to
what Venetians want us to focus on," said Sima Kostovetsky, the new
Outreach Officer elected in June 2019, who continued the promotion of the
survey.
--A
bright spot in the Survey was that Venetians generally felt safe in their own
neighborhoods, with Abbot Kinney Boulevard regarded as the safest place in Venice.
Among the
99 Neighborhood Councils that represent communities across Los Angeles, the
Venice Neighborhood Council (VNC) is one of the most established and one of the
most successful — consistently having the highest voter turnout compared to
that of any other neighborhood council.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)